7 Most Notable Pros and Cons of Paying College Athletes

College sports is a rapidly growing industry in the United States. Football players, basketball, and baseball players all fill up the stadiums on game night, go out and put their personal health on the line, to bring that win to the school. The school charges people for tickets, monetizes off of television air time, has players participate in interviews, and makes bank on merchandising. This leaves one big question here, what about the players? The issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid has been one that comes up over and over, but is never truly solved. Let’s look at the effects that paying collegiate athletes to play could possibly have on the entire system.

The Pros of Paying College Athletes

1. It’s A Full Time Job

Being a college athlete is not simply a hobby. It is something that requires one hundred percent dedication. These players have to manage their time between performing well academically, attending practices daily, and being ready to play games each week. Other students that are not involved in sports have more time to go out and get a job to help support themselves. These college players do not and should be helped financially for playing.

2. The Players Are The One Putting It All On The Line

Sports are not a no risk situation. Players get injured quite often, and sometimes the injuries are so substantial that they completely destroy the sports career of the player. This is the type of risk that is not taken lightly by the athletes, and shouldn’t be taken lightly by the school either. They should be compensated for their risk.

3. They Are Bringing In Massive Amounts Of Revenue Each Week

Just by playing, the students bring in ticket sales, merchandise sales, and many other sources of income. When the play well, the school makes even more money. It is only fair that the player is compensated for this.

4. It Would Help Prepare Them For The Major Leagues

College students aren’t usually known for their financial savvy. When players go straight from college to making millions of dollars, the do not have the know how to manage it correctly. A huge majority of professional sports players go completely broke within years of their retirement. By paying them during their college days, they would begin to learn and understand how to better manage money and avoid these same mistakes.

The Cons of Paying College Athletes

1. College Athletes Are Being Paid With An Education

College players may be playing for the school, but they are also obtaining a high class education on the school’s dime. Sports scholarships pay for the majority of players to attend the school and play sports. By paying these players, they are receiving double the benefits of normal students on scholarships for things such as academics.

2. It’s A Sticky Situation

College sports are not like professional sports for many reasons. The amount of money that is actually brought in is not as astounding as many think, and some sports bring in more than others. It is hard to determine how much of a profit will be made form week to week. This could put the school in a bad spot financially, as well as single out players who do not perform as well as others by paying them less.

3. The Money Benefits The Entire School

While the money that is made from the enterprise created by the sports team at a college doesn’t go directly to them, it does benefit them in many different ways. The money is put back into the school, which aids in advancing the campus, lowering tuition, and improving the school overall.

Pin It

Comments are closed.